It should come as no surprise that selecting a software development methodology has gained popularity over time, since even modest projects would falter without the proper strategy. It is a formalized method of communication that explains the "how" of the software life cycle. However, it can occasionally be difficult to select the best approach for managing a project because not every methodology works well with every type of business.
For an instance, Cisco used the waterfall model for building its Subscription billing platform. This platform created room for multiple issues like slower speed of development, increased overtime, a missed delivery date, quality issue and many others which made them adopt the scaled agile framework to collaborate on building and testing small features within a single SaaS component.
Consequently, it spared the system integration and testing team overtime by delivering the latest version of SBP. Both of these teams worked together to cut Cisco's defects by 40% and boost the efficiency of defect removal by 14%.
Let us assist you in selecting the finest software development approach by outlining its benefits, drawbacks, and stages in this post.
Let’s begin the discussion by understanding What is Software development methodologies.
The mix of organized procedures to be used when working on a development project is known as software development techniques. You could also refer to it as a defined method or a methodical approach to explaining the life cycle of each software component.
Apart from that, software development techniques define standards that define how developers or development teams will collaborate and exchange information, including written discussions, documentation, and even sketches.
Let’s learn all the software development methodologies.
Custom software development companies are using various development methods like Agile, Spiral, Scrum,Extreme programming, rational unified process, Big bang to deliver a premium product to its clients.
Therefore, it becomes natural for the clients to deploy a combination of software development methods per their team’s needs and the expectations of their stakeholders. Therefore, using different software development methodologies becomes highly recommendable.
Here are a few well-liked software development techniques that have been created in the IT world to take advantage of diverse resources:
Agile methodology is an iterative way of transforming a bunch of requirements into software. Constant planning, understanding, communication, development, delivery, and updation are the crucial aspects of the Agile process. In addition, Agile software development methodologies focus on the direct engagement of teams and clients to understand goals better and give timely solutions.
In addition, there are further Agile frameworks, such as Scrum of Scrums (SoS), Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), and Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). The advantages of Cisco implementing the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) have already been covered.
The first phase is the concept phase, where the product owner will determine the project scope.
The second phase is the inception phase where the owner needs to hire remote developers who possess the most efficient skills.
The iteration phase follows, during which developers collaborate with UI/UX designers.
You should carry out quality assurance testing prior to releasing the finished product.
The software creator will continue to work on updates and future versions of the program.
Faster deployment leads to quicker software delivery; teams meet in person to make sure everything proceeds as planned.
adheres to the Keep It Simple philosophy to make ongoing process adjustments
After delivering each increment, agile teams are able to monitor the velocity of the development process.
Enhanced customer happiness, productivity, and company value
Agile method converts extensive data into smaller pieces of user stories thus making it difficult for the developers to grab the exact requirements of the customer.
A lack of documented plan would confuse developers when they are moving through various stages of the projects.
It can be difficult to maintain consistent cooperation.
When the features of the product aren’t well defined.
When more designers are available for modeling.
When the ideas are required to be communicated immediately with the team.
The Scrum technique is an iterative development process where team members utilize sprints to work on large tasks in smaller steps. This incremental approach encourages quicker development, which benefits intricate projects. In addition, the Scrum framework helps engineers combine flexible Agile approaches with traditional system development methodologies.
Product owners will state the requirements in a document that is known as product backlog.
Afterwards, the scrum team builds a sprint backlog and assesses the progress in a daily scrum meeting.
ScrumMaster makes sure that everyone on the team is focused on the objective.
The sprint is then concluded with a review by the ScrumMaster.
Makes certain that groups function as efficiently as possible
Useful in removing unplanned costs and delays in time
A well-defined agenda for sprint meetings
Allows teams to test the product in advance of release to look for any potential issues.
Accepts modifications with ease and incorporates them into the upcoming sprint
There are chances of booming scope creep due to a lack of fixed end-date.
There is a major chance that a project might fail if the individuals do not cooperate.
Adoption might become challenging but there are chances of a successful attempt if the members are experienced.
It needs extensive training and can be challenging to scale.
Would require significant transformation within the organization.
When your team comprises very talented and experienced developers.
When your requirements are not entirely clear.
useful for modest to medium-sized projects.
Since the trend gained traction in the IT industry between 2007 and 2008, the term "DevOps" has been widely used. Software development and IT operations are combined with a set of cutting-edge tools, techniques, and process automation concepts called DevOps.
DevOps also offers a platform for rapidly developing, testing, and distributing software. Consequently, it guarantees improved outcomes and permits continuous product delivery.
Ongoing Integration
Ongoing Examination
Ongoing Improvement
Ongoing Implementation
Automates monotonous work to foster quick creativity
Stabilize the workplace and raise the caliber of the output
Increased clarity regarding system outputs
Possibility of invention
Appropriate use of instruments and resources
Its meaning is unclear.
High prices and intricacy
It's difficult to find a huge pool of DevOps experts.
Moving to DevOps is an accomplishment in and of itself.
To safeguard your processes during the software development life cycle
When speeding up scaling doesn't mean compromising safety
When automating company processes is what you want
This method was introduced in 1970 by Winston Royce in one of his research papers, this model is a sequential and straightforward approach to focus on the logical progression of the steps in the development processes. When using this method the developer should complete each stage before the next phase begins.
Analyzing requirements
Design-Installation
Testing units
System testing and integration
Maintenance and operation phase
It is well-organized and simple to use.
Well-defined objectives and due dates
stringent reporting structure that allows the administrator complete control
Software release dates can be swiftly ascertained by developers.
Modifications and specifications are possible beforehand
Does not allow for process overlaps
Not appropriate for intricate and dangerous projects
even if there is only one modification, it disrupts the entire process flow.
This methodology does not allow for error correction.
Does not accrue risk
The project won't be ongoing for very long.
Sufficient lucidity on product definition and technology
When resources are freely accessible
As soon as your feature set is clear
This is a risk-driven software development model which combines both an iterative and waterfall models. Each phase in this model initiates with a pre-defined goal and it ends with a client review. In a spiral technology, software engineering team includes a functionality for each requirement in an ever-changing spiral until the application is set to go into the production phase.
Planning,
Risk Analysis,
Engineering
Evaluation
Ideal for important and large-scale projects
Additional features can be added as the project develops.
Strong approval and control over paperwork
provides increased effectiveness for risk analysis
The spiral model costs a lot of money.
Requires experience with risk assessment techniques
Ineffective for small-scale projects
High chance of missed deadlines and excessive expenses
Focusing on exploration, research, and the new product line
Users' understanding of the requirements is unclear
When it's necessary to create a prototype
When a lot of adjustments are needed
The project is enormous in scope.
From Agile to DevOps, we help businesses implement the best software development approach to ensure scalability, efficiency, and success.
Software development teams can incorporate a small set of software requirements using the incremental or iterative development paradigm, which empowers the evolving versions of the system until the full system is ready.
The entire software development process is divided into manageable chunks using this methodology. Using this paradigm in the early stages of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is an advantage. Because of this, engineers are able to identify any form of defect and implement affordable fixes.
Planning
Analyzing
Implementing
Evaluating
This model accelerates the software development process.
Allows for the addition of additional features.
It is possible to develop concurrently.
Changes can be implemented gradually.
Spending less time on documentation
Designing gets quicker
Lack of clarity in requirements can lead to problems with software architecture.
In order to lower inherent project risk, highly qualified specialists are needed.
a higher likelihood of complicated management
The development process's final product is unknown.
The requirements are precise and well-stated.
The application is quite massive.
Future development and modifications are required.
This is one of the popular methodologies for custom software development where developers can add a variety of testing functionalities at every stage of a project that leads to the timely completion of the project. However, moving to the next step before completing the previous one won’t be possible in this type of development method which would prevent you from getting diverted from the project goal.
User Acceptance
Integration, System
Unit Testing
Examining
Errors can be eliminated in the early phases.
Simple and user-friendly approach
It's simpler to keep track of project progress.
The procedure for validation to guarantee an enterprise-grade product
Greater success rate in comparison to the waterfall paradigm
Extremely dangerous and unclear
Uncertainty regarding the project's objective
does not allow for phase iteration
Unsuitable for intricate projects
unable to manage multiple events at once
The requirements are clear and well-defined.
Ideal for small and medium-sized projects
When sufficient technical resources and critical technical knowledge is present.
It is the most simple and straightforward model in the software development life cycle as it doesn’t require any in-depth planning or complex procedure. Whereas, it combines time, effort and resources to build a product as per the needs of the client.
In this model, each and every module runs differently and the defective ones are removed. Therefore, a big bang model is an ideal choice for any small project where one or two developers are only required.
Straightforward and simple to use
Gives developers more flexibility
Gives a brief overview of the prototype
Enables developers to combine the newest technology and tools
The development requires a limited amount of resources.
No requirement for supervisory personnel
Extremely unclear and hazardous
Not recommended for larger-scale projects
If criteria are not specified clearly, it is costly.
Not appropriate for ongoing projects
When there are lax rules for the introduction of new products
The needs of the user remain unclear
Project needs that are always changing
When working on a project that doesn't demand a lot of brainstorming
When working on a development project for a Singapore bank in 1997, Jeff De Luca and Peter Coad used the feature-driven development paradigm for the first time. They collaborated with a group of fifty experts to deliver the product in 15 months.
This five-step development strategy focuses on creating features in brief iterations. The FDD team consists of a project manager, chief programmer, chief architect, development manager, chief programmer, class owner, and domain expert.
Build the entire model.
Make a feature list.
Organize according to feature
Feature-based design
Feature-based construction
Provides information on the project's context and scope.
Communicates through documents
Cut back on the quantity of meetings
Performs effectively in lengthy or extensive projects
Divides various aspects into more manageable portions
Largely reliant on the lead programmer
Doesn't give customers software evidence
A stronger emphasis on individual code ownership
Incompatible with outdated systems
Projects that call for constant refinement
When enhancing scalability is your goal
When end users are clearly understood by you
The prototype is known as a crude version of the actual system which possibly has a few limited capabilities, low reliability and an inefficient performance as compared to the actual software. Nonetheless, it is vital as the client often possesses a basic overview of what is expected from the final software.
Gathering and analyzing requirements
Quicker design
Construct a prototype.
first assessment by the user
Changing the definition of the prototype
Application of the Product
Prompt maintenance
Increased adaptability and mistake detection
Locating any missing functionality is simpler.
It is simple to adapt to new features.
Engage clients directly in the development process.
Makes systems easier for clients and developers to comprehend Drawbacks
It requires extensive testing on numerous prototypes, which takes a long period.
Having inadequate documentation due to constantly changing customer needs
High development and upfront expenses
The prototype's quality could be negatively impacted.
When a considerable degree of user engagement is necessary
Excellent human-computer interface systems can be designed with a high degree of user engagement in web interfaces.
A rapid application development or RAD prioritizes speedier customer feedback and a rapid prototyping over any tedious development and testing cycles. A RAD model enables developers to think of numerous iterations and updates to software quickly without the need to start from scratch. Further, it also ensures that the outcome is quality-driven and aligns with the requirements of end-users.
Planning goals
Design of prototypes
Quick development
Production
Accelerated development and incorporation of customer comments
There are comparatively fewer failures.
Rework is drastically decreased.
Consistent provision of consumer value
Reduced integration problems
Constant feedback and quantifiable
Bigger tasks might not be suitable for RAD.
need advanced developing abilities
Continuously negative feedback could throw the flow off.
When a system must be modularized in two to three months
When you always require trustworthy criticism of your prototypes
If you have a large budget for equipment and development
This is the last set of methods in software development which mainly focuses on waste reduction, optimizing the overall efficiency and delivering what is required for the software product development. In lean software development approach, software engineers would release the primary or the initial version of the software.
Waste management
constructing high-quality
Gaining expertise Postponing commitment
Quicker shipping
Honor individuals
Maximize everything.
Reduced expenses and lead times
Enhanced exposure of the project
Increases the overall output of the team.
Reduction of resource wastage
smooth handling of priorities that change
Absence of a sound plan
Not appropriate for a team lacking experience
Making decisions becomes challenging and time-consuming.
Developers may frequently stray from their initial goals while working with Software Requirements Specification (SRS) documents.
When there is a deadline for your initiatives
If the task at hand is extremely complex
There is a lack of communication efficiency
If the goal of your project is to reduce wasteful spending.
We’ve got a table prepared for you which covers key aspects and key considerations of all the software development methodologies
Methodology | Key Focus | Stages Involved | Key Considerations for Implementation |
Agile Methodology | Flexibility and iterative progress | 1. Concept phase | Frequent client collaboration, adaptive planning, ideal for dynamic environments |
Scrum Methodology | Sprint-based development for faster progress | 1. Product Backlog | Works well for incremental releases, demands high team collaboration and discipline |
DevOps Methodology | Continuous integration and delivery | 1. Continuous Integration | Requires strong collaboration between development and operations teams, fosters automation |
Waterfall Methodology | Linear phase-based process | 1. Requirement Analysis | Best for well-defined projects with fixed timelines, limited flexibility to accommodate changes |
Spiral Methodology | Risk management and iterative refinement | 1. Planning | Great for complex, risk-sensitive projects with evolving requirements |
Iterative Methodology | Incremental delivery with evolving product versions | 1. Planning | Emphasizes continuous feedback and improvement, requires strong early-stage planning |
V Model Methodology | Verification and validation-focused process | 1. Requirements | Suitable for projects with stable, clear requirements, early detection of issues through testing at every phase |
Big Bang Methodology | Flexible approach with minimal planning | 1. Resource Allocation | Best for smaller projects with flexible, undefined requirements, but can be risky for larger-scale efforts |
Feature-Driven Development (FDD) Methodology | Focus on feature-building iterations | 1. Domain Modeling | Supports large-scale development by organizing tasks into manageable features |
Prototype Methodology | Prototype creation to gather feedback | 1. Requirement Gathering | Ideal when client requirements are unclear, involves extensive client interaction and feedback |
Rapid Application Development (RAD) Methodology | Speed and user feedback-driven prototyping | 1. Requirements Planning | Focuses on fast delivery with frequent user feedback, suitable for short development cycles |
Lean Development Methodology | Waste reduction and efficiency | 1. Identify Waste | Prioritizes value creation and fast delivery, works well in environments focused on minimizing waste |
Now, further let us understand the process to choose the right Software development methodology.
The software development space has seen a huge change in the last few decades & businesses must analyze the data before an end product delivery. Technology legends like Mocrosoft and Google innovated new frameworks to manage the complete process of project lifecycle.
A software development methodology can either make or break the development project as implementing an incorrect methodology can lead to an unsatisfied client, frustrated employee and a delayed project completion.Therefore, you should carefully choose the best for your enterprise.
Below are a few pointers that can help you choose a suitable software development methodology -
Collect all the necessary information about your stakeholders.
Select the development method which fits your budget.
Consider the level of flexibility that the chosen method offers.
Choose the best fit timeframe, i.e. Sprint or Marathon.
Be aware about your development team size, location and time zone.
Integrating an excellent software development product method can build a consistent structure for any project to allow you to strategize it properly. Moreover, a software development method can standardize your product launch process, thus enabling you to stay ahead of your competitors and inspire your stakeholders’ confidence by working smartly and efficiently.
Avoid project failures by choosing the right development methodology. Our skilled developers help you implement the best-suited approach for your product.
One of the top IT outsourcing firms, Acquaint Softtech builds software and provides clients with IT staff augmentation. Since the lack of competent developers is currently a major problem, we are here to help businesses hire remote developers, grow their remote teams, and meet their app development needs.
Furthermore, because we are an official Laravel Partner, businesses may engage experts in the MEAN, MERN, and Laravel stack from us for as little as $15 per hour. As a result, you may onboard in less than 48 hours and avoid delays in your app development cycle.
Since the early days of programming, developers have continued to use software development approaches. It can help developers create reliable tools and applications with success.
The approaches to software development that are discussed here are widely used. They do, however, call for various degrees of proficiency. You should therefore weigh their advantages and disadvantages. You should also take into account the project's scope, the required software development tools, the development budget, the availability of resources, and the timeline.
Thus, assess the software development approaches discussed here and select the one that will be most effective for your company. If you need help choosing the appropriate software development technique for your upcoming project, don't hesitate to contact our specialists.
The Agile methodology is one of the most widely used and popular software development approaches. Its flexibility, iterative nature, and focus on continuous collaboration between development teams and clients make it highly effective for a wide range of projects. Agile allows teams to adapt to changes quickly and deliver software incrementally, ensuring that the product aligns with user needs throughout the development cycle.
Choosing the right methodology depends on several factors, including:
Project Size and Complexity: Large, complex projects may benefit from methodologies like Spiral or Feature-Driven Development (FDD), while smaller, well-defined projects may work well with Waterfall.
Flexibility Requirements: If the project scope is likely to change, an iterative and flexible methodology like Agile or Scrum is a better choice.
Risk Levels: If risk management is a primary concern, Spiral is ideal due to its focus on identifying and addressing risks throughout the process.
Project Timeline: Rapid Application Development (RAD) and Lean are perfect for shorter timelines with quick delivery cycles.
The Waterfall methodology is best used when the project has clearly defined, stable requirements and no anticipated changes. It works well for short-term projects where the end product is well understood from the start, and the development process can be planned out in linear, sequential steps. However, it’s less suitable for projects requiring flexibility or ongoing updates.
Agile is an overarching philosophy and set of principles for iterative software development, while Scrum is a specific framework within Agile. Scrum organizes work into fixed-length iterations called sprints, usually 2-4 weeks, where a cross-functional team works on defined tasks. Scrum is a more structured, detailed application of Agile principles, making it highly effective for managing team workloads and delivering product increments regularly.
DevOps combines software development and IT operations, aiming to shorten the development lifecycle and deliver software updates continuously. The key advantages include:
Automation of repetitive tasks, which speeds up the development process.
Improved collaboration between development and operations teams, reducing silos and enhancing communication.
Continuous delivery of updates and new features.
Faster feedback loops from end users, leading to quicker adjustments and higher-quality releases.
DevOps is particularly valuable for projects requiring frequent updates and rapid scalability without compromising security.
I love to make a difference. Thus, I started Acquaint Softtech with the vision of making developers easily accessible and affordable to all. Me and my beloved team have been fulfilling this vision for over 15 years now and will continue to get even bigger and better.
Both - Proof of Concept and Minimum Viable Product - serve you with their unique purpose. Know here exactly how they differ from each other.
You need to define roles and permissions to control the access to your database. Fortunately, Laravel has made easy you to do so. Here is how.
The SOS app is a live saver, for physical attacks, natural calamities, etc. It has several applications like tracking, monitoring, real-time status, etc.
Technical Partner
We ensure you’re matched with the right talent resource based on your requirement.